F#
From $1
Table of contents
Status Owner Importance Complexity MD Version
Completed tomasp Normal Medium 2.4
Provide support for creating and compiling F# projects, with support for code completion, and a REPL pad.
This has been implemented by an externally-developed addin, available at Functional Variations.
- Tag page
- What links here
[MISSING: skin.common.header-gallery-count]
| Images 0 | ||
|---|---|---|
| No images to display in the gallery. |
Viewing 15 of 22 comments: view all
#8
jshore? says:
+1 here
Posted 22:01, 20 Mar 2010
#9
javax? says:
+1, yes, this would be *really* good to have
Posted 14:12, 23 Apr 2010
#10
ChrisFS? says:
I would really appreciate a language binding for F# as I'm convinced: Functional programming is the future!
Posted 22:02, 27 Apr 2010
#11
railcar88? says:
+1, yes please.
Posted 18:08, 26 May 2010
#12
rodbv? says:
+1 for it, F# would be a big plus for MonoDevelop, it's such a great language
Posted 01:33, 31 May 2010
#13
JWM2005? says:
+1, F# in MonoDevelop would make it a really good development platform.
Posted 16:37, 31 May 2010
#14
holsee? says:
+1, F# in MonoDevelop would be nice. I will have to look into the extensibility/plug-in model for MonoDevelop.
Posted 05:54, 11 Jun 2010
#15
Crush? says:
+1. Support for F# would be great. It would also put MonoDevelop ahead of Visual Studio since there isn't an "Express Edition" for F# yet. edited 13:28, 23 Jul 2010
Posted 13:27, 23 Jul 2010
#16
artyomszasa? says:
+1
Posted 19:21, 23 Jul 2010
#17
IsMise? says:
+1, I'd love to have this feature.
Posted 02:26, 6 Aug 2010
#18
rookboom? says:
Yes, please. Pretty please. With a cherry on top.
Posted 01:55, 16 Oct 2010
#19
Gluttton? says:
+1 F# in MonoDevelop would be great.
Posted 06:39, 28 Nov 2010
#20
alximik00? says:
Still pending? It's sad :(
Posted 00:59, 5 Dec 2010
#21
Gluttton? says:
Please provide support F# in NUnit projects.
Posted 17:01, 15 Dec 2010
#22
redhound says:
FunctionalVariations addin is old and I have some troubles compiling / running it with latest versions of MonoDevelop. And F# Compiler aren't part of it, so I vote for including F# compiler & F# interactive & F# language binding in standard MD repository! F# is really "must-have" language to such a great IDE, as MD - it not only realize functional style of programming, but language-oriented too.
Posted 12:21, 15 Mar 2012
Viewing 15 of 22 comments: view all
You must login to post a comment.
Page last modified 04:21, 6 Dec 2010 by M.j.hutchinson